Brands are among the most valuable assets of many companies. The value of the Apple brand alone exceeded the trillion-dollar mark in 2024, highlighting the significance of intangible asset valuation in business valuations and purchase price allocation. Various methods play a role here, including the relief-from-royalty method. The relief-from-royalty method provides a structured approach to valuing intangible assets, enhancing transparency in accounting. We will outline the basic concept, explain the necessary steps for implementation, and assess its suitability for application under IFRS and tax law.
The relief-from-royalty-method is a well-established valuation technique based on net present value principles.
It is widely used in particular for brand valuation, but also for patents and technologies. A common application involves purchase price allocation for business combinations under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This method is also widely used for tax purposes to determine the value of intangible assets and ensure accurate tax compliance.
The relief-from-royalty method is a valuation approach that estimates the value of an intangible asset based on the hypothetical royalties a company would incur if it lacked ownership and needed to license the asset from an external party.
These implied license savings reflect the asset's value contribution.
To apply the relief-from-royalty-method, two primary steps are necessary:
The intangible asset's value is determined by calculating the present value of future tax-adjusted license savings. This involves discounting future payments to the present day to account for the time value of money.
To determine the value of a brand using the relief-from-royalty method, three key elements are required:
To apply the relief-from-royalty-method, the following steps are typically followed:
First, comparable licenses are identified by considering factors such as industry, region, brand type, and useful life. An average license rate is then calculated based on these comparable licenses. Finally, this rate is discounted to the present day to determine the brand's value.
The reliability of the valuation results depends on the quality of the data used, particularly the careful selection of comparable license agreements, which requires an in-depth understanding of relevant markets and industries.
The relief-from-royalty method offers a relatively straightforward approach to valuing intangible assets, requiring a revenue forecast, a royalty rate, and a suitable cost of capital rate.
While IFRS provides some flexibility in choosing the royalty rate, tax law imposes more stringent requirements. This difference stems from the distinct objectives of these two legal frameworks.
Discussions with tax authorities are common, as determining a market-based license rate often involves subjective judgment due to the scarcity of directly comparable transactions.
Moreover, transfer pricing regulations must be adhered to, especially for intercompany license agreements, to prevent artificial profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions.
Finally, taxpayers must provide detailed justifications and evidence for the chosen license rate, necessitating extensive documentation.
The relief-from-royalty-method is a valuable tool for valuing intangible assets, especially brands, patents, and technologies. By measuring asset value in terms of hypothetical license payments, it offers a transparent and understandable approach.
Applicable in both IFRS and tax law, the method's strength lies in its simplicity and ability to quantify intangible asset value.
However, its application presents challenges. Determining a market-based license rate can be subjective due to the scarcity of comparable transactions. Moreover, data quality is crucial for reliable results. Tax law imposes stricter requirements, particularly regarding the arm's-length principle and documentation.
The relief-from-royalty method is a valuation approach that estimates the value of an intangible asset, such as a brand, patent, or technology, based on hypothetical royalties a company would pay if it didn’t own the asset and needed to license it instead. The method calculates the present value of future royalty savings, which reflects the asset's contribution to the company's value. This method is commonly used for brand valuation, especially in purchase price allocations under IFRS and for tax compliance purposes.
To apply the relief-from-royalty method, three main data elements are essential:
The accuracy of the valuation heavily relies on the quality of these inputs, particularly the selection of comparable license agreements.
Under IFRS, the relief-from-royalty method aims to provide useful information for capital markets and allows flexibility in choosing the royalty rate, as long as it’s reasonable. In contrast, tax law requires stricter adherence to the arm's-length principle to prevent artificial tax advantages. Tax authorities often scrutinize royalty rates closely, requiring evidence that they align with standard market conditions. Transfer pricing regulations also apply, especially for intercompany agreements, to prevent profit shifting.
One of the primary challenges in the relief-from-royalty method is determining an appropriate market-based royalty rate, which can be subjective due to the lack of directly comparable transactions. Additionally, high-quality data is essential for accurate results, and the selection of comparables requires deep market knowledge. Tax law also imposes rigorous requirements, including thorough documentation to justify the chosen rate in accordance with the arm's-length principle.
We support you in researching the data — e.g. putting together the peer group — with a short training session on how to use the platform. We are happy to do this based on your specific project.